Value of Dual Assessment of Carcinoembryonic Antigen and Fluorine-18-Fluoro-Deoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography in Colorectal Cancer Recurrence

Saeed Mohammed Bafaraj 1 *
More Detail
1 Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
* Corresponding Author
EUR J BASIC MED SCI, Volume 5, Issue 2, pp. 25-30. https://doi.org/10.21601/ejbms/9232
OPEN ACCESS
Download Full Text (PDF)

ABSTRACT

Globally, colorectal cancer is a common medical problem and improvement of survival in patients with colorectal carcinoma could be achieved by identifying disease recurrence and progression, as well as by specifying their treatment planning. The use of various biomarkers associated with radio diagnosis techniques is not common in daily clinical practice. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the usefulness of dual assessment of FDG-PET and CEA in detecting recurrence of colorectal carcinoma in patients subsequent to colonic resection or rectal amputation. One hundred sixty patients, 99 males and 61 females, the mean of their age was 55.76 ± 12.25 years with suspected recurrent colonrectal cancer (CRC) after previous colonic resection or rectal amputation for CRC were included in this prospective study from February 2011 to March 2015. The inclusion criteria were: histopathologically confirmed colorectal adenocarcinoma, curative resection of the primary tumor, at least 3 months before and availability for follow-up after 18F-FDG PET/CT and CEA for at least 12 months. The CEA levels were measured within the time of the FDG PET/CT study. Only 132 patients were confirmed by histopathology or 6 month clinical follow up had local recurrence or metastasis (47 patients were confirmed had Intra-abdominal extra-hepatic recurrence , 80 patients had extra-abdominal and/or hepatic recurrence , 30 patients had other form of recurrence (17 patients had metastasis at other sites as the neck, long bones , mediastinal lymph nodes and multiple metastases) .The PET/CT diagnosis of recurrence and metastasis in CRC patients included in the study. Out of 160 patients after CRC resection, 126 patients were diagnosed by PET/CT as true-positive cases (25.62% Stage II /53.13% and I Stage III/IV) and 34 patients as negative cases (21.25 %). The sensitivity of monitoring the recurrence and metastasis of patients with CRC by PET/CT was 95.45 %. However, the diagnostic value of CEA levels for recurrence and metastasis in CRC patients included in the study proved that 102 patients had increased value of CEA (63.8%) and 58 patients (36.2%) had normal CEA value. The sensitivity of the CEA levels for monitoring the recurrence of the patients with CRC was 77.27 %. The sensitivity of the 18F-FDG PET/CT scan is superior to CEA in detection of colorectal cancer recurrence and dual assessment is important in treatment planning.

CITATION

Bafaraj SM. Value of Dual Assessment of Carcinoembryonic Antigen and Fluorine-18-Fluoro-Deoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography in Colorectal Cancer Recurrence. Eur J Basic Med Sci. 2015;5(2):25-30. https://doi.org/10.21601/ejbms/9232

REFERENCES

  • Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Hao Y, Xu J, Thun M. Cancer statistics, 2009,” CA. A Cancer Journal for Clinicians 2009; 59(4): 225–249.
  • Jemal A, Tiwari R, Murray T. Cancer Statistics, 2004,” CA. A Cancer Journal for Clinicians 2004;54(1): 8–29.
  • Scholl HJ, VanCutsem E, Stein A. ESMO Consensus guidelines for the management of patients with colon and rectal cancer. A personalized approach to clinical decision making. Ann Oncol 2012; 23: 2479-2516.
  • Jeffery M, Hickey BE, Hider PN. Follow-Up Strategies for Patients Treated For Non-Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2002;1: Cd002200.
  • Siegel R, DeSantis C, Jemal D. Colorectal cancer statistics, 2014. CA Cancer J Clin 2014;64:104-17.
  • Siegel R, DeSantis C, Virgo K. Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin 2014;62:220-41.
  • National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. The Diagnosis and Management of Colorectal Carcinoma-Clinical Guideline CG131. NICE 2011; 1:186.
  • Kim HS, Lee MR. Diagnostic accuracy of elevated serum carcinoembryonic antigen for recurrence in postoperative stage II colorectal cancer patients: comparison with stage III. Ann Coloproctol 2013;29:155-9.
  • Lu YY, Chen JH, Ding HJ. A systematic review and metaanalysis of pretherapeutic lymph node staging of colorectal cancer by 18- FDG-PET or PET/CT. Nucl Med Commun 2012;33:1127-33.
  • Gold P, Freedman SO. Specific carcinoembryonic antigens of the human digestive system. J Exp Med 1965;122(3):467-81.
  • Moertel CG, O’Fallon JR, Go VL. The preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen test in the diagnosis, staging, and prognosis of colorectal cancer. Cancer 1986; 58:603-610.
  • Kyoto Y, Momose M, Kondo C, Itabashi M, Kameoka S, Kusakabe K. Ability of 18F-FDG PET/CT to diagnose recurrent colorectal cancer in patients with elevated CEA concentrations. Ann Nucl Med 2010;24:395–401.
  • Moertel CG, Fleming TR, Macdonald JS, Haller DG, Laurie JA, Tangen C. (1993). An evaluation of the carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) test for monitoring patients with resected colon cancer. JAMA 1993;270:943–7.
  • Votrubova J, Belohlavek O, Jaruskova M. The role of FDGPET/CT in the detection of recurrent colorectal cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2006;33: 779–784.
  • Lin M. Molecular imaging using positron emission tomography in colorectal cancer. Discov Med 2011;11:435-47.
  • Kishimoto G, Mrakami K, Con SA. Follow-up after curative resection for colorectal cancer: impact of positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET/CT). Rev Gastroenterol Peru 2010;30(4):328-33.
  • Artiko V, Odalovic S, Sobic-Saranovic D, Petrovic M, Stojiljkovic M, Petrovic N, Kozarevic N, Grozdic-Milojevic I, Obradovic V. Can (18) F-FDG PET/CT scan change treatment planning and be prognostic in recurrent colorectal carcinoma? A prospective and follow-up study. Hell J Nucl Med 2015;18(1):35-41.
  • American Cancer Society. Colorectal Cancer Facts & Figures 2011-2013. Atlanta: American Cancer Society, 2011.
  • Abulafi AM, Williams NS. Local recurrence of colorectal cancer: the problem, mechanisms, management and adjuvant therapy. Br J Surg 1994;81: 7–19.
  • Young PE, Womeldorph CM, Johnson EK, Maykel JA, Brucher B, Stojadinovic A, Avital I, Nissan A, Steele SR. Early detection of colorectal cancer recurrence in patients undergoing surgery with curative intent: current status and challenges. J Cancer 2014;5(4):262-71.
  • Caglar M, Yener C, Karabulut E. Value of CT, FDG PET-CT and serum tumor markers in staging recurrent colorectal cancer. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 2014; 10(7):993-1002.
  • Votrubova J, Belohlavek O, Jaruskova M, Oliverius M, Lohynska R, Trskova K, Sedlackova E, Lipska L, Stahalova V. The role of FDG-PET/CT in the detection of recurrent colorectal cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2006;33(7):779-84.
  • Maas M, Rutten IJG, Nelemans. What is the most accurate whole-body imaging modality for assessment of local and distant recurrent disease in colorectal cancer? A metaanalysis. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2011;38:1560-71.
  • Zhang C, Chen Y, Xue H, Zheng P, Tong J, Liu J, Sun X, Huang G. Diagnostic value of FDG-PET in recurrent colorectal carcinoma: a meta-analysis. Int J Cancer 2009;124(1):167-73.
  • Tan E, Gouvas N, Nicholls RJ. Diagnostic precision of carcinoembryonic antigen in the detection of recurrence of colorectal cancer. Surg Oncol 2009;18(1): 15-24.
  • Chen CS, Hsieh MC, Lai CC. Lead-time of carcinoembryonic antigen elevation in the postoperative follow up of colorectal cancer did not affect the survival rate after recurrence. Int J Colorectal Dis 2010;25:567-571.
  • Metser U, You J, McSweeney S. Assessment of Tumor Recurrence in Patients with Colorectal Cancer and Elevated Carcinoembryonic Antigen Level: FDG PET/CT versus Contrast-Enhanced 64-MDCT of the Chest and Abdomen. Am J Roentgenol 2010;194:766-771.
  • Young PE, Womeldorph CM, Johnson EK, Maykel JA, Brucher B, Stojadinovic A, Avital I, Nissan A, Steele SR. Early detection of colorectal cancer recurrence in patients undergoing surgery with curative intent: current status and challenges. J Cancer 2014;15 (4):262-71.